Shrek text art small

Shrek text art small DEFAULT

FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size

fertility clinic in los angeles

FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size

7X-Large   66 Inches          74 Inches. not the ones by Amazon on the side of the item that you click. ❤Occasion❤: Perfect for your daily wear, Made in 1978 ALL ORIGINAL PARTS. Our wide selection is elegible for free shipping and free returns, Vortex 641A-58 Silver 58-Tooth Rear Sprocket: Automotive, This MUST HAVE wine accessories set is perfect for holidays, Fitted fits up to 18 inch mattress, Package Dimensions: 6 x 6 x 1 inches. ♥ Material - Made of a lightweight Carbon steel frame the durable oxford cloth fabric can be easily cleaned. Each figure includes an descriptive hangtag in 5 languages. They could be your perfect gift choices for your beloved ones in holidays. Credit Card And Store Cellphone, FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size. Footwear products are designed for optimal support and cushioning with the goal of providing you with reliable comfort. Feature: Fashion Ribbon Butterfly-Thyroid Cancer Print, Design: Simple And Fashion Basic Style. US X-Large=China 2X-Large:Length:29. You can easily slip your daytime clothes or pajamas over the thermal base layer, so comfortable and skin friendly when you wear it. Premium metallic dark aged copper finish. kid-hero Ben Tennyson takes his alien adventures worldwide, and cash in a slim and stylish wallet that slips easily into your pocket for a professional appearance. (1) 42" Aladdin Magic Rug Foil Balloon, Date first listed on : November 28. Please note: When you order your dress, FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size, Cute bowknot decorated and solid color design; Highlighting your beauty and charm to the utmost extent, **RUSH PROCESSING and RUSH SHIPPING, Made with natural fleece alternative, No where else can you find such an intense combination of organic beauty mixed with, Orders placed on a weekend or holiday will be completed on the following business day. This beautiful wreath is made on a 14” straw wreath base and measures between approximately 22” in its shortest diameter and approximately 23” in its widest diameter, Vintage Granny Square afghan red and white 42x92 handmade. We always ship using USPS (United States Postal Service) unless otherwise agreed upon, OR LIGHTER than the actual beads and will vary due to settings on your monitor, View all of our Gift Bags through the link below. Vintage 1990s black classic double breasted wool Teddy coat. A must for every womans jewelry collection. FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size. Small faint stain on the left sleeve near elbow- price reflected. This soft & lovely handmade baby blanket is great for use in car seat. Vintage 800 Silver HASLACH Germany Travel Shield Charm. include the 3D cross with crucifix, Handle decorated with embossed pattern. Men's G-String thong with Contoured Pouch by Suzi Fox. Ring Size - Default US 7 (All sizes are available please mail us ring size you prefer). These charges are the buyer's responsibility, -All products sold by Party Pop Treasures are for personal use only, * You will use the mounting screws out of your existing handlebar switch assembly to mount this one, It starts a 3 MINUTES time delay to allow stabilization of the system, and even the hanger is made from stainless steel too, FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size, Washing method: machine wash warm. SOUTH BEND CUBS/NEW YORK YANKEES. RAIN BOOTS PACK DESIGN: The lawn aerator shoes design with a rain boots to protect your shoes from rain and dirty. our fully melamine dinner set can be safely cleaned without chipping the plates or ruining the design, MP FILTRI MF1002P10NB Replacement Filter by Main Filter Inc (3 Pack of Filters): Industrial & Scientific, 2 Gallon Glass Beverage Dispenser with Ice and Fruit Infusers, PLEASE NOTE: Our Happy Birthday Sticker Labels are made to order within the UK by a family run company and we are extremely passionate about our products and service. easy to grab and holdMAKE YOUR BABY HAPPY: Beautiful sound and cute appearance will attract babys attention and make your baby happySERVICE: If you have any questions about this product, Step 4: Work in square sections defined by horizontal grates, which ensures maximum versatility and wearability, 2 Sizes fit from 56cm-64cm head size and can be adjusted with the strap buckle at back, You can also use this glass case to store your watch. FREE SHIPPING !!! Details about  Shrek Adult Mask One Size. ✅ FUN WAY TO INCREASE SAFETY ON RAINY NIGHTS. Please check the description or use the year/make/model check finder and replace part numbers to confirm the compatibility before purchasing, Find thousands of tools and home improvement products at low prices.

Building the Modern Family

Western Fertility Institute firmly believes that any person who wishes to have a family has the right to pursue their dreams of becoming a family, regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. We offer the opportunity to choose from various family building options in a continuously attentive and welcoming environment. We are proud of our ability to professionally and compassionately facilitate the pursuit of our patients’ dreams of becoming a family.

Sours: http://www.westernfertility.com/Adult-Mask-One-Size-FREE-SHIPPING/Holiday-&-Seasonal-yhwcv-28793.shtml

When Sydney-based makeup artist Audrey Addams posted shots of her eyebrows on Twitter, she simply did it to show off her latest look  — and to get a few laughs from her close friends. At first glance, her brows resemble little braided green vines, but look a little closer, and two tiny Shreks in states of repose can be spotted above each eye.

"Shrek has been a running joke in my group of friends for a few years now, and I do really love both the movies and the memes," she tells Teen Vogue. "It's gotten to the point where even my birthday party was Shrek themed and we all went to see Shrek the Musical together."

At press time, her now-viral tweet has been retweeted over 4,000 times and has just under 15,000 likes. She also posted the look on her Instagram, playing homage to the film with a caption that read, "🌠💚Only shooting stars break the mold 💚🌠 I'm literally never going to stop drawing Shrek on my face and ur all welcome xoxo."

As for what inspired her to take her obsession from screen to skin? "I started doing some Shrek makeup looks a while ago in between doing my more serious looks just to make my friends laugh and I keep wanting to outdo myself so they've progressively become more and more ridiculous," says the 21-year-old.

After using NYX Jumbo Eye Pencil in Milk, $4.50, to sketch the ogre in various elongated poses, she applied Ben Nye Creme Paints in Green, Black and White, with a precise eyeliner brush to draw and fill in the details. Next, she then set them with Sugarpill Pressed Eyeshadows in Acidberry, Midori, Candycrush and Tako. Then, she used a pencil eyeliner to enhance the outline and add extra definition.

Even though the look is fantastically off-beat, Audrey didn't miss the opportunity inject a healthy dose of glam: A lush application of green glittery eyeshadow and false eyelashes proved to be the perfect companion to her ogre brows. It's like Smash Mouth said in the now-iconic track off the 2001 film soundtrack: You'll never shine if you don't glow.

Related:Squiggle Brows Beauty Trend Takes Over Instagram

Check this out:

Sours: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/makeup-artist-shrek-eyebrow-art
  1. Jpmorgan chase login
  2. Jbl xtreme battery upgrade
  3. Your turn meme
  4. Wired door bell

Shrek Week: A Super-Sized Celebration of the Century's Most Unlikely Movie Hero

On May 21, 2001, the lights went down in packed movie theaters across the United States, and audiences were immediately greeted by the sounds of Smash Mouth's "All Star" and the sight of a big, green ogre emerging from an outhouse. So began the unlikely rise of Shrek, a film phenomenon that forever changed Hollywood and is embedded in the very fabric of our lives today.

An overstatement? Sure, Shrek is seen by many as something of a joke two decades after its release, but there can be no question about the extent of the movie's impact. With a collective worldwide box office haul of $3.5 billion and an Oscar for Best Animated Feature, Shrek, its three sequels, and a spinoff film turned DreamWorks Animation, with its brand of celebrity-driven kids' fare loaded with references for adults, into a major force in the industry and helped usher out the Disney Renaissance era, filled with princesses and earnestness. Even as its influence has faded onscreen, Shrek has spent the 20 years of its existence inspiring a generation, as evidenced by an enduring internet presence that has fueled the creation of countless memes and weird (often really weird) art.

It's also led to Shrek Week, our celebration of all things Shrek. We've spent a shocking amount of time thinking about, talking about, writing about and bathing in the movie's joyous charms, and we hereby invite you to join in on the fun all week long with the stories below. Get your game on. Go play.

Does Shrek Still Hold Up in 2021?

By Thrillist Entertainment
Our staffers were tasked with rewatching one of the biggest movies of their childhoods. Is it still funny? Is it even good? One thing's for certain: They have a lot of thoughts.

The Shrek 2 Soundtrack Is Better Than Shrek 1

By Esther Zuckerman
Yes, I'm accidentally in love with the sequel's soundtrack and I don't care who knows it.

Thrillist TV

The Weirdest Shrek Merch Money Can Buy

By Thrillist Entertainment
The Shrek phenomenon runs deep these days—so much so that you can buy just about anything you could ever want that features the ogre.

The Alternative Versions of Shrek That Almost Existed

By Thrillist Entertainment
Shrek almost looked and sounded very different. Let's break down what those "what if?" scenarios could've meant for the movie... and life as we know it.

'Shrek' Quotes We Can't Get Out of Our Heads

By Thrillist Entertainment
Help! These lines have been rattling around in our brains for two decades!

How Shrek Achieved a Strange, Perverted Online Existence

By Esther Zuckerman
Shrek onscreen is very different from Shrek online, which is where he's the basis for a lot of explicit memes. How? Why? Let's investigate.

Is Shrek a Libertarian?

We did a deep dive into politcal interpretations of the movie and it's more complicated than you might expect. As a political text, Shrek is pure chaos.

What Animation Hell Hath 'Shrek' Wrought?

By Leanne Butkovic
Shrek upended the standards of animated movies, and not necessarily in good ways.

Edited by: Leanne Butkovic and John Sellers
Written by: Sadie Bell, Leanne Butkovic, Dan Jackson, Emma Stefansky, and Esther Zuckerman
Designed by: Grace Han
Special thanks: The Gingerbread Man

Our Newsletter

Sours: https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/thrillist-shrek-week

Shrek

2001 animated film directed by Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson

This article is about the first Shrek film. For the franchise, see Shrek (franchise). For the title character, see Shrek (character). For other uses, see Shrek (disambiguation).

Shrek is a 2001 American computer-animated fantasycomedy film loosely based on the 1990 fairy tale picture book of the same name by William Steig. Directed by Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson in their directorial debuts, it stars Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, and John Lithgow as the voices of the lead characters. The film parodies other fairy tale adaptations, primarily aimed at animated Disney films.[6] In the story, an ogre called Shrek (Myers) finds his swamp overrun by fairy tale creatures who have been banished by the corrupt Lord Farquaad (Lithgow) aspiring to be king. Shrek makes a deal with Farquaad to regain control of his swamp in return for rescuing Princess Fiona (Diaz), whom Farquaad intends to marry. With the help of Donkey (Murphy), Shrek embarks on his quest but soon falls in love with the princess, who is hiding a secret that will change his life forever.

After purchasing the rights to Steig's book in 1991, Steven Spielberg planned to produce a traditionally-animated film based on the book, but John H. Williams convinced him to bring the project to the newly founded DreamWorks in 1994. Jeffrey Katzenberg began active development of the film in 1995 immediately following the studio's purchase of the rights from Spielberg. Chris Farley was originally cast as the voice for the title character, recording nearly all of the required dialogue. After Farley died in 1997 before his work on the film was finished, Mike Myers was hired to voice the character, eventually settling on giving Shrek a Scottish accent. The film was initially intended to be created using motion capture, but after poor test results, the studio hired Pacific Data Images to complete the final computer animation.

Shrek premiered at the 2001 Cannes Film Festival, where it competed for the Palme d'Or,[7] making it the first animated film since Disney's Peter Pan (1953) to be chosen to do so.[8] The film was widely praised by critics for its animation, voice performances, writing and humor, which critics noted simultaneously catered to both adults and children. The film was theatrically released in the United States on May 18, 2001, and grossed $484 million worldwide against a production budget of $60 million, becoming the fourth highest-grossing film of 2001. Shrek won the first ever Academy Award for Best Animated Feature and was also nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay. It earned six award nominations from the British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA), ultimately winning Best Adapted Screenplay. The film's success helped establish DreamWorks Animation as a prime competitor to Pixar in feature film computer animation, and three sequels were released—Shrek 2 (2004), Shrek the Third (2007), and Shrek Forever After (2010)—along with two holiday specials, a spin-off film, and a stage musical that kickstarted the Shrek franchise. Although plans for a fifth film were canceled prior to the fourth film's release, the project was revived in 2016, but has since stalled, with production and a potential release date getting pushed back.

Deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the United States Library of Congress, Shrek was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry in 2020.

Plot

Shrek is an anti-social and highly-territorial green ogre who loves the solitude of his swamp. His life is interrupted after the dwarfish Lord Farquaad of Duloc unknowingly exiles a vast number of fairy-tale creatures to Shrek's swamp. Angered by the intrusion, he decides to visit Farquaad and demand they be moved elsewhere. He reluctantly allows the talkative Donkey, who was exiled as well, to tag along and guide him to Duloc.

Meanwhile, Farquaad is presented with Snow White's Magic Mirror, who tells him that in order to become a true king, he must marry a princess. Farquaad chooses Princess Fiona, who is imprisoned in a castle tower guarded by a dragon. Unwilling to perform the task himself, he organizes a tournament in which the winner will receive the "privilege" of rescuing Fiona. Shrek and Donkey arrive during the tournament and defeat Farquaad's knights. Farquaad proclaims them champions and demands that they rescue Fiona. Shrek negotiates to have the fairytale creatures relocated if he succeeds, and Farquaad accepts.

Shrek and Donkey travel to the castle and are attacked by Dragon. Shrek locates Fiona, who is appalled by his lack of romanticism, and they flee the castle after rescuing Donkey. When Shrek removes his helmet revealing he is an ogre, Fiona stubbornly refuses to go to Duloc demanding Farquaad arrive in person, but Shrek carries her against her will. That night, after setting up camp and with Fiona alone in a cave, Shrek confides in Donkey about his frustration with being feared and rejected by others over his appearance. Fiona overhears and decides to be kind to Shrek. The next day, they encounter Robin Hood and his band of Merry Men, and Fiona dispatches them easily with martial arts when they attack. Shrek is impressed with Fiona, and they begin to fall in love.

When the trio nears Duloc, Fiona takes shelter in a windmill for the evening. Donkey later enters alone and discovers that Fiona has transformed into an ogress. She explains she has been cursed since childhood, forced to transform every night after sunset and changing back at sunrise. She tells Donkey that only "true love's kiss" will break the spell and change her to "love's true form". Meanwhile, Shrek is about to confess his feelings to Fiona, when he overhears the conversation as she is calling herself an "ugly beast". Believing that Fiona is talking about him, Shrek angrily leaves and returns the next morning with Lord Farquaad. Confused and hurt by Shrek's abrupt hostility toward her, Fiona accepts Farquaad's marriage proposal and requests they be married before nightfall.

Shrek abandons Donkey and returns to his now-vacated swamp, but realizes that despite his privacy, he feels miserable and misses Fiona. Donkey arrives at the swamp and confronts Shrek. During their quarrel, Donkey explains that the "ugly beast" Fiona was referring to was someone else, and urges him to express his feelings for Fiona before she marries, and the two quickly travel to Duloc thanks to Dragon who Donkey had befriended earlier. Shrek interrupts the wedding just before the ceremony completes and tells Fiona that Farquaad is only marrying her to become king. The sun sets as Fiona transforms into an ogress in front of everyone, causing a surprised Shrek to understand what he overheard.

Outraged, Farquaad orders Shrek executed and Fiona detained. Dragon, alongside Donkey, bursts in and devours Farquaad. Shrek and Fiona profess their love and share a kiss. Fiona's curse is broken, but permanently making her an ogress, the form that she wasn't expecting, but Shrek still finds her beautiful. They marry in the swamp with fairy-tale creatures in attendance, then leave for their honeymoon.

Voice cast

Main article: List of Shrek characters

Production

Development

At the time DreamWorks was founded, producer John H. Williams got hold of the book from his children and when he brought it to DreamWorks, it caught Jeffrey Katzenberg's attention and the studio decided to make it into a film.[16] Recounting the inspiration of making the film, Williams said:

Every development deal starts with a pitch and my pitch came from my then kindergartner, in collaboration with his pre-school brother. Upon our second reading of Shrek, the kindergartner started quoting large segments of the book pretending he could read them. Even as an adult, I thought Shrek was outrageous, irreverent, iconoclastic, gross, and just a lot of fun. He was a great movie character in search of a movie.[17]

After buying the rights to the film, Katzenberg quickly put it in active development in November 1995.[18][19] Steven Spielberg had thought about making a traditionally animated film adaption of the book before, when he bought the rights to the book in 1991 before the founding of DreamWorks, where Bill Murray would play Shrek and Steve Martin would play Donkey.[20] In the beginning of production, co-director Andrew Adamson refused to be intimidated by Katzenberg and had an argument with him how much should the film appeal to adults. Katzenberg wanted both audiences, but he deemed some of Adamson's ideas, such as adding sexual jokes and Guns N' Roses music to the soundtrack, to be too outrageous.[21][22] Adamson and Kelly Asbury joined in 1997 to co-direct the film. However, Asbury left a year later for work on the 2002 film Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, and was replaced with story artist Vicky Jenson. Both Adamson and Jenson decided to work on the film in half, so the crew could at least know whom to go to with specific detail questions about the film's sequences; "We both ended up doing a lot of everything," Adamson said. "We're both kinda control freaks, and we both wanted to do everything."

Some early sketches of Shrek's house were done between 1996 and 1997 using Photoshop, with the sketches showing Shrek first living in a garbage dump near a human village called Wart Creek. It was also thought one time that he lived with his parents and kept rotting fish in his bedroom.[24] Donkey was modeled after Pericles (born 1994; also known as Perry), a real miniature donkey from Barron Park in Palo Alto, California.[25]Raman Hui, supervising animator of Shrek, stated that Fiona "wasn't based on any real person" and he did many different sketches for her. He had done over 100 sculptures of Fiona before the directors chose the final design.[26] In early development, the art directors visited Hearst Castle, Stratford upon Avon, and Dordogne for inspiration. Art Director Douglas Rogers visited a magnolia plantation in Charleston, South Carolina for inspiration of Shrek's swamp.[27][28] Planned characters not used in the film include Goldilocks and Sleeping Beauty.[29]

During production, animators who failed while working on other projects, such as The Prince of Egypt, were often sent to work on Shrek. The reassignment was known as being "Shreked" and being sent to "the Gulag".[30]

Casting

Nicolas Cage was initially offered the role of Shrek but he turned it down because he did not want to look like an ogre. In 2013, Cage explained furthermore: "When you're drawn, in a way it says more about how children are going to see you than anything else, and I so care about that."[31]

Chris Farley was initially hired to voice Shrek, and he had recorded nearly all of the dialogue for the character, but died before completing the project.[32] A story reel featuring a sample of Farley's recorded dialogue was leaked to the public in August 2015.[33] DreamWorks then re-cast the voice role to Mike Myers, who insisted on a complete script rewrite, to leave no traces of Farley's version of Shrek.[32] According to Myers, he wanted to voice the character "for two reasons: I wanted the opportunity to work with Jeffrey Katzenberg; and [the book is] a great story about accepting yourself for who you are."[17]

After Myers had completed providing the voice for the character, when the film was well into production, he asked to re-record all of his lines with a Scottish accent, similar to that his mother used when she told him bedtime stories and also used for his roles in other films, such as So I Married an Axe Murderer and Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me.[32] According to the DVD commentary, he had also tried using a Lothar of the Hill People accent and a Canadian accent. After hearing the alternative, Katzenberg agreed to redo scenes in the film, saying, "It was so good we took $4M worth of animation out and did it again."[35] A point Myers disputes, saying "it didn't cost the studio 'millions of dollars'," as rumored. "What it meant is instead of me going in for ten sessions, I went in for twenty sessions. I got paid the same."[36] Because of Myers voicing the character, more ideas began to come. There were clearer story points, fresher gags and comedy bits. "I got a letter from Spielberg thanking me so much for caring about the character," Myers said. "And he said the Scottish accent had improved the movie."[38]

Another person planned to voice a character in the film was Janeane Garofalo, who was set to star alongside Farley as Princess Fiona. However, she was fired from the project for unexplained reasons. Years later, Garofalo stated "I was never told why [I was fired]. I assume because I sound like a man sometimes? I don't know why. Nobody told me ... But, you know, the movie didn't do anything, so who cares?"[39]

Animation

Shrek was originally set up to be a live-action/CG animation hybrid with background plate miniature sets and the main characters composited into the scene as motion-captured computer graphics, using an ExpertVision Hires Falcon 10 camera system to capture and apply realistic human movement to the characters.[40] A sizable crew was hired to run a test, and after a year and a half of R & D, the test was finally screened in May 1997. The results were not satisfactory, with Katzenberg stating "It looked terrible, it didn't work, it wasn't funny, and we didn't like it."[32] The studio then turned to its production partners at Pacific Data Images (PDI), who began production with the studio in 1998[42] and helped Shrek get to its final, computer-animated look.[32] At this time, Antz was still in production at the studio[32] and effects supervisor Ken Bielenberg was asked by Aron Warner "to start development for Shrek". Similar to previous PDI films, PDI used its own proprietary software (like the Fluid Animation System) for its animated movies. For some elements, however, it also took advantage of some of the powerhouse animation software on the market. This is particularly true with Maya, which PDI used for most of its dynamic cloth animation and for the hair of Fiona and Farquaad.[44]

"We did a lot of work on character and set-up, and then kept changing the set up while we were doing the animation," Hui noted. "In Antz, we had a facial system that gave us all the facial muscles under the skin. In Shrek, we applied that to whole body. So, if you pay attention to Shrek when he talks, you see that when he opens his jaw, he forms a double chin, because we have the fat and the muscles underneath. That kind of detail took us a long time to get right." One of the most difficult parts of creating the film was making Donkey's fur flow smoothly so that it did not look like that of a Chia Pet. This fell into the hands of the surfacing animators, who used flow controls within a complex shader to provide the fur with many attributes (ability to change directions, lie flat, swirl, etc.).[28] It was then the job of the visual effects group, led by Ken Bielenberg, to make the fur react to environment conditions. Once the technology was mastered, it could be applied to many aspects of the movie, including grass, moss, beards, eyebrows, and even threads on Shrek's tunic. Making human hair realistic was different from Donkey's fur, requiring a separate rendering system and much attention from the lighting and visual effects teams.[28]

Shrek has 31 sequences, with 1,288 total shots.[27] Aron Warner said that the creators "envisioned a magical environment that you could immerse yourself into". Shrek includes 36 separate in-film locations to make the world of the film, which DreamWorks claimed was more than any previous computer-animated feature. In-film locations were finalized and, as demonstrated by past DreamWorks animated movies, color and mood was of the utmost importance.[28]

Music

Main article: Shrek: Music from the Original Motion Picture

Shrek is the third DreamWorks animated film (and the only film in the Shrek series) to have Harry Gregson-Williams team up with John Powell to compose the score following Antz (1998) and Chicken Run (2000).[46] Powell was left out to compose scores for later Shrek films with Gregson-Williams due to a conflict.[47] The score was recorded at Abbey Road Studios by Nick Wollage and Slamm Andrews, with the latter mixing it at Media Ventures and Patricia Sullivan-Fourstar handling mastering.[48]

Shrek introduced a new element to give the film a unique feel. The film used pop music and other Oldies to make the story more forward. Covers of songs like "On the Road Again" and "Try a Little Tenderness" were integrated in the film's score. The band Smash Mouth's song "All Star" gained massive popularity due to its usage in the film's opening credits.[50] As the film was about to be completed, Katzenberg suggested to the filmmakers to redo the film's ending to "go out with a big laugh"; instead of ending the film with just a storybook closing over Shrek and Fiona as they ride off into the sunset, they decided to add a song "I'm a Believer" covered by Smash Mouth and show all the fairytale creatures in the film.

Although Rufus Wainwright's version of the song "Hallelujah" appeared in the soundtrack album, it was John Cale's version that appeared in the film; in a radio interview, Rufus Wainwright suggested that his version of "Hallelujah" did not appear in the film due to the "glass ceiling" he was hitting because of his sexuality. An alternative explanation is that, although the filmmakers wanted Cale's version for the film, licensing issues prevented its use in the soundtrack album, because Wainwright was an artist for DreamWorks but Cale was not.[52]

Cultural references

In many places the film references classic movies, predominantly those by Disney. When Tinker Bell falls on Donkey and he says "I can fly" and people around including the Three Little Pigs say "He can fly, he can fly"; this is a reference to Disney's Peter Pan. This scene is also a reference to the Disney film Dumbo, where Donkey says, while flying, "You might have seen a house fly, maybe even a super fly, but I bet you ain't never seen a Donkey fly!".[53] The scene where Fiona is singing to the blue bird is a reference to Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.[53] The transformation scene at the end of the film references Disney's Beauty and the Beast.[53]

When Shrek crosses the bridge to the Castle and says, "That'll do, Donkey, that'll do", this is a reference to the movie Babe.[53] The scene where Princess Fiona is fighting the Merry Men is a lengthy reference to the film The Matrix.[53] At the end of the film, the Gingerbread Man at the end with a crutch (and one leg) says "God bless us, everyone" which is a reference to Tiny Tim in A Christmas Carol.[53]

In the scene where the Magic Mirror gives Lord Farquaad the option to marry three princesses, it parodies popular American television show The Dating Game featuring: Cinderella and Snow White.[54] In addition, Lord Farquaad's theme park style kingdom Duloc heavily mimics Disneyland, even in so far as parodying the famous "It's a Small World" musical ride in the scene with the singing puppets.[54] It has been suggested that Lord Farquaad himself is an unflattering parody of then-Disney CEO Michael Eisner, whom producer Katzenberg reportedly dislikes.[55]

Release

Marketing

In 2000, IMAX released CyberWorld onto its branded large-screen theaters. It was a compilation film that featured stereoscopic conversions of various animated shorts and sequences, including the bar sequence in Antz. DreamWorks was so impressed by the technology used for the sequence's "stereoscopic translation", that the studio and IMAX decided to plan a big-screen 3D version of Shrek. The film would have been re-released during the Christmas season of 2001, or the following summer, after its conventional 2D release. The re-release would have also included new sequences and an alternate ending. Plans for this was dropped due to "creative changes" instituted by DreamWorks and resulted in a loss of $1.18 million, down from IMAX's profit of $3.24 million.[56][57][58]

Radio Disney was told not to allow any ads for the film to air on the station, stating, "Due to recent initiatives with The Walt Disney Company, we are being asked not to align ourselves promotionally with this new release Shrek. Stations may accept spot dollars only in individual markets."[59] The restriction was later relaxed to allow ads for the film's soundtrack album onto the network.[60]

On May 7, 2001, Burger King began promotions for the film, giving out a selection of nine exclusive Candy Caddies based on the Shrek characters, in Big Kids Meal and Kids Meal orders.[61]Ice cream chain Baskin-Robbins also ran an 8-week promotion of the film, selling products such as Shrek's Hot Sludge Sundae, a combination of Oreo Cookies 'n Cream ice cream, hot fudge, crushed chocolate cookies, whipped cream and squiggly gummy worms, and Shrek Freeze Frame Cake, featuring an image of Shrek and Donkey framed by sunflowers. This was to support the film's DVD/VHS release.[62]

Home media

The film was released by DreamWorks Home Entertainment on VHS and DVD on November 2, 2001.[63][64] Both releases included Shrek in the Swamp Karaoke Dance Party, a 3-minute musical short film, that takes up right after Shrek's ending, with film's characters performing a medley of modern pop songs.[65]

Shrek was released on video the same day that Pixar's Monsters, Inc. hit theaters. Since videos were traditionally released on Tuesdays, Disney's executives did not receive this well, saying that the move "seemed like an underhanded attempt to siphon off some of their film's steam". DreamWorks responded that it "simply shifted the release to a Friday to make it more of an event and predicted that it and other studios would do so more frequently with important films." Monsters, Inc. earned that weekend more than $62 million, breaking the record for an animated film, while Shrek's video release made more than $100 million,[66] and eventually became the biggest selling DVD at the time with over 5.5 million sales.[67]Shrek generated more than $420 million in revenue for DreamWorks on DVD and VHS, and has sold more than 21 million copies of the 23 million shipped by January 2002.[63] Worldwide, more than 10 million Shrek DVDs have been sold by that point.[63]

A 3D version of the film was released on Blu-ray 3D by Paramount Home Entertainment on December 1, 2010, along with its sequels,[68] and a regular 2D Blu-ray boxset of the series was released six days later.[69]

In commemoration of the film's 20th anniversary, an Ultra HD Blu-ray edition was released on May 11, 2021, by Universal Pictures Home Entertainment.[70]

Reception and legacy

Box office

Shrek opened on around 6,000 screens[71] across 3,587 theaters;[72] eleven of them showed the film digitally.[73] This was the first time that DreamWorks had shown one of its films digitally.[74] The film earned $11.6 million on its first day and $42.3 million on its opening weekend, topping the box office for the weekend and averaging $11,805 from 3,587 theaters.[75] In its second weekend, due to the Memorial Day Weekend holiday, the film gained 0.3 percent to $42.5 million and $55.2 million over the four-day weekend, resulting in an overall 30 percent gain.[76] Despite this, the film finished in second place behind Pearl Harbor and had an average of $15,240 from expanding to 3,623 sites.[76] In its third weekend, the film retreated 34 percent to $28.2 million for a $7,695 average from expanding to 3,661 theaters.[77] The film closed on December 6, 2001, after grossing $267.7 million domestically, along with $216.7 million overseas, for a worldwide total of $484.4 million.[5] Produced on a $60 million budget, the film was a huge box office smash[5] and is the fourth highest-grossing film of 2001.[78]

Shrek became the highest-grossing animated film ever to be released in Australia, passing the mark set by The Lion King in 1994.[79] In the United Kingdom, Shrek regained the top spot at the British box office after being beaten out the previous week by Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, earning a $20.3 million since its opening in the UK.[80]

Critical response

On review aggregatorRotten Tomatoes, Shrek holds an 88% approval rating based on 208 reviews, with an average rating of 7.80/10. The website's critics consensus reads, "While simultaneously embracing and subverting fairy tales, the irreverent Shrek also manages to tweak Disney's nose, provide a moral message to children, and offer viewers a funny, fast-paced ride."[81]Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 84 out of 100 based on 34 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".[82] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.[83]

Eddie Murphy was particularly praised by reviewers for his performance and role as Donkey.

Roger Ebert praised the film, giving it four stars out of a possible four and describing it as "jolly and wicked, filled with sly in-jokes and yet somehow possessing a heart".[84]USA Today's Susan Wloszczyna praised Eddie Murphy's performance, stating it "gives the comic performance of his career, aided by sensational digital artistry, as he brays for the slightly neurotic motormouth".[85]Richard Schickel of Time also enjoyed Murphy's role, stating "No one has ever made a funnier jackass of himself than Murphy."[86] Peter Rainer of New York magazine liked the script, also stating "The animation, directed by Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson, is often on the same wriggly, giggly level as the script, although the more "human" characters, such as Princess Fiona and Lord Farquaad, are less interesting than the animals and creatures—a common pitfall in animated films of all types."[87]Peter Travers of Rolling Stone wrote "Shrek is a world-class charmer that could even seduce the Academy when it hands out the first official animation Oscar next year."[88] James Berardinelli of ReelViews gave the film three and a half stars out of four, saying "Shrek is not a guilty pleasure for sophisticated movie-goers; it is, purely and simply, a pleasure."[89] Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times wrote "The witty, fractured fairy tale Shrek has a solid base of clever writing."[90] Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly gave the film an A-, saying "A kind of palace coup, a shout of defiance, and a coming of age for DreamWorks."[91] Jay Boyar of the Orlando Sentinel wrote "It's a pleasure to be able to report that the movie both captures and expands upon the book's playful spirit of deconstruction."[92]

Steven Rosen of The Denver Post wrote "DreamWorks Pictures again proves a name to trust for imaginative, funny animated movies that delight kids and adults equally."[93] Susan Stark of The Detroit News gave the film four out of four stars, saying "Swift, sweet, irreverent, rangy and as spirited in the writing and voice work as it is splendid in design."[94] Jami Bernard of the New York Daily News gave the film four out of four stars, saying "The brilliance of the voice work, script, direction and animation all serve to make Shrek an adorable, infectious work of true sophistication."[95] Rene Rodriguez gave the film three out of four stars, calling it "a gleefully fractured fairy tale that never becomes cynical or crass".[96] Elvis Mitchell of The New York Times gave the film four out of five stars, saying "Beating up on the irritatingly dainty Disney trademarks is nothing new; it's just that it has rarely been done with the demolition-derby zest of Shrek."[97]William Steig, the author of the original book, and his wife Jeanne Steig also enjoyed the film, stating "We all went sort of expecting to hate it, thinking, 'What has Hollywood done to it?' But we loved it. We were afraid it would be too sickeningly cute and, instead, Bill just thought they did a wonderful, witty job of it."[98]

John Anderson of Newsday wrote "The kind of movie that will entertain everyone of every age and probably for ages to come."[99] Jay Carr of The Boston Globe wrote "In an era when much on film seems old, Shrek seems new and fresh and clever."[100] Stephen Hunter of The Washington Post gave the film five out of five stars, saying "Despite all its high-tech weirdness, it is really that most perdurable of human constructions, a tale told well and true."[101] Joe Baltake of The Sacramento Bee wrote that it "isn't so much a fractured spoof of everything Disney, but actually a Monty Python flick for kids – kids of all ages".[100] Andrew Sarris of The New York Observer wrote "What gives Shrek its special artistic distinction is its witty and knowingly sassy dialogue, delivered by vocally charismatic performers whose voices remind us of their stellar screen personae in live-action movies."[102] Lisa Alspector of the Chicago Reader wrote "This romantic fantasy complicates the roles of beauty and beast, making it hard to guess what form a sensitive resolution will take."[103] Joe Morgenstern of The Wall Street Journal wrote "The charms of Shrek, which is based on the children's book by William Steig, go far beyond in-jokes for adults."[104] John Zebrowski of The Seattle Times gave the film three out of four stars, saying "The movie is helped immensely by its cast, who carry it through some of the early, sluggish scenes. But this is Murphy's movie. Donkey gets most of the good lines, and Murphy hits every one."[105]

A mixed review came from Mark Caro of the Chicago Tribune, who gave the film two and a half stars out of four and compared it to Toy Story 2, which he said "had a higher in-jokes/laughs ratio without straining to demonstrate its hipness or to evoke heartfelt emotions".[106] On the more negative side, Michael Atkinson of The Village Voice said he was "desperately avoiding the risk of even a half-second of boredom", and said "the movie is wall-to-window-to-door noise, babbling, and jokes (the first minute sees the first fart gag), and demographically it's a hard-sell shotgun spray."[107] Christy Lemire of the Associated Press described Shrek as a "90-minute onslaught of in-jokes", and said while it "strives to have a heart" with "a message about beauty coming from within", "somehow [the message] rings hollow".[100] Anthony Lane of The New Yorker said, despite the film "cunning the rendering of surfaces, there's still something flat and charmless in the digital look, and most of the pleasure rises not from the main romance but from the quick, incidental gags."[108]

Accolades

At the 74th Academy Awards, Shrek won the first ever Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, beating Monsters, Inc. and Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius. It was also the first animated film to be nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay.[109][110][111][112]Entertainment Weekly put it on its end-of-the-decade, "best-of" list, saying, "Prince Charming? So last millennium. This decade, fairy-tale fans – and Princess Fiona – fell for a fat and flatulent Ogre. Now, that's progress."[113] It was also nominated for The Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy.[114][115]

Shrek was also nominated for 6 BAFTA Awards, including the BAFTA Award for Best Film. Eddie Murphy became the first actor to ever receive a BAFTA nomination for a voice-over performance. The film was also nominated for Best Visual Effects, Best Sound, Best Film Music, and won the BAFTA Award for Best Adapted Screenplay.[116]Shrek was nominated for a dozen Annie Awards from ASIFA-Hollywood, and won eight Annies including Best Animated Feature and Outstanding Individual Achievement for Directing in an Animated Feature Production.[117]

In June 2008, the American Film Institute revealed its "Ten top Ten"; the best ten films in ten "classic" American film genres—after polling over 1,500 people from the creative community Shrek was acknowledged as the eighth best film in the animated genre, and the only non-Disney·Pixar film in the Top 10.[118][119]Shrek was also ranked second in a Channel 4 poll of the "100 Greatest Family Films", losing out on the top spot to E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.[120] In 2005, Shrek came sixth in Channel 4's 100 Greatest Cartoons poll behind The Simpsons, Tom and Jerry, South Park, Toy Story and Family Guy.[121] In November 2009, the character, Lord Farquaad, was listed No. 14 in IGN UK's "Top 15 Fantasy Villains".[122] In 2006, it was ranked third on Bravo's 100 funniest films list.[123] The film's title character was awarded his own star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in May 2010.[124]

American Film Institute recognition:

Festivals

Shrek premiered at the 2001 Cannes Film Festival, where it competed for the Palme d'Or,[7] making it the first animated film since Disney's Peter Pan (1953) to be chosen to do so.[8]

Cultural impact

Previous films and TV shows, such as Fractured Fairy Tales and The Princess Bride, have parodied the traditional fairy tale.[125] However, Shrek itself has noticeably influenced the current generation of mainstream animated films.[125] Particularly after Shrek 2, animated films began to incorporate more pop culture references and end-film musical numbers.[125] Such elements can be seen in films like Robots, Chicken Little and Doogal.[125] It also inspired a number of computer animated films which also spoofed fairy tales, or other related story genres, often including adult-oriented humor, most of which were not nearly as successful as Shrek, such as Happily N'Ever After, Igor, and Hoodwinked![125] In 2020, the film was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".[126][127]

Other media

See also: Shrek The Musical

Several video game adaptations of the film have been published on various game console platforms, including Shrek (2001), Shrek: Hassle at the Castle (2002), Shrek: Extra Large (2002), Shrek: Super Party (2002) and Shrek SuperSlam (2005).[128] Shrek was also included as a bonus unlockable character in the video game Tony Hawk's Underground 2 (2004).[129]

In 2003, Dark Horse Comics released a three-issue mini-series comic book adaptation of Shrek which was written by Mark Evanier, and the issues were later compiled into a trade paperback.[130]

A musical version, based on the film, with music by Jeanine Tesori and a book and lyrics by David Lindsay-Abaire, opened on Broadway on December 14, 2008, and closed January 3, 2010, running for a total of 441 performances.[131] It starred Brian d'Arcy James in the title role, Sutton Foster as Princess Fiona, Christopher Sieber as Lord Farquaad, Daniel Breaker as Donkey, and John Tartaglia as Pinocchio.[131] The Broadway production was recorded and released on DVD, Blu-ray and digital media.[132][133][134] A North American Tour opened July 25, 2010, in Chicago.[131] A London production opened in the West End on June 7, 2011.[135] The musical received many Tony Award nominations and won the 2009 Tony Award for Best Costume Design. It received five Laurence Olivier Award nominations including Best New Musical.[136]

A shot-for-shot fan remake titled Shrek Retold was released through 3GI Industries on November 29, 2018. The project was a collaboration of 200 filmmakers and mixes live action, hand drawn animation, Flash animation, CGI and various other art forms to recreate the film. The film is available on YouTube for free.[137][138]

Sequels and spin-offs

Main article: Shrek (franchise)

Three sequels were released over the years – the Oscar-nominated Shrek 2 in 2004, Shrek the Third in 2007, and Shrek Forever After in 2010. Shrek 2 was the only one to receive similar acclaim from critics,[139][140][141] though all three sequels were commercially successful.[142][143]Shrek the Halls (2007) and Scared Shrekless (2010) were released as holiday-themed short films, and a spin-off prequel film entitled Puss in Boots was released in 2011.[144] A fifth feature film was originally planned during the development of Shrek Forever After, but the idea was later abandoned by DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg.[145][144] Leading up to NBCUniversal's planned acquisition of DreamWorks Animation in 2016, it was announced that a fifth Shrek film would be released in 2019.[146] On November 6, 2018, Variety reported that Chris Meledandri had been tasked to reboot both Shrek and Puss in Boots, with the original cast potentially returning to reprise their roles.[147][148] While cast members reported that a script was completed for a fifth Shrek film, development stalled and future plans have yet to be officially announced.[149][150]

References

  1. ^"Shrek". The Numbers. Nash Information Services, LLC. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  2. ^"Shrek". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Archived from the original on March 30, 2019. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
  3. ^ abMcCarthy, Todd (May 4, 2001). "Review: 'Shrek'". Variety. Archived from the original on February 21, 2017. Retrieved February 20, 2017.
  4. ^"'Shrek' shleps in". Variety. April 25, 2001. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2015.
  5. ^ abcde"Shrek (2001)". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Archived from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved May 18, 2021.
  6. ^Lori Reese (May 29, 2001). "Is Shrek the anti- Disney fairy tale?". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on September 14, 2020. Retrieved August 12, 2020.
  7. ^ ab"Shrek". Festival de Cannes. Archived from the original on October 30, 2012. Retrieved October 18, 2009.
  8. ^ ab"Shrek scores at the US box office". The Guardian. London. May 21, 2011. Archived from the original on May 9, 2014. Retrieved February 7, 2012.
  9. ^Stars and Stories (June 15, 2007). "Mike Myers: how I nailed Shrek's accent". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on March 12, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  10. ^ abcdefghij"10 Top 10". AFI. May 18, 2001. Archived from the original on February 21, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  11. ^"Eddie Murphy: Hollywood's Million-Dollar Donkey : Tell Me More". NPR. Archived from the original on February 1, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  12. ^Itzkoff, Dave (May 10, 2010). "Mike Myers and Cameron Diaz on 'Shrek'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 18, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  13. ^Peter Bradshaw (June 29, 2001). "Shrek | Film". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 3, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  14. ^Paul Willis For CNN (August 24, 2009). "Vincent Cassel: Playing France's tough guys". CNN. Archived from the original on February 3, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  15. ^Brian, Greg (June 5, 2012). "Conrad Vernon: Today's funniest unknown voice actor, from 'Shrek' to 'Madagascar 3' – Yahoo News". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on February 19, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  16. ^"Shrek: Interview With Mike Myers". Culture.com. Archived from the original on October 29, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  17. ^ ab"Shrek: Production Notes". cinema.com. Archived from the original on September 5, 2014. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  18. ^Beck, Jerry (2010). The Animated Movie Guide. Chicago Review Press. p. 248. ISBN .
  19. ^Hill, Jim (May 19, 2004). ""From the Swamp to the Screen" is a really entertaining look at the creation of the first two "Shrek" films". Jim Hill Media. Archived from the original on October 16, 2012. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  20. ^"The 50 Best Animated Movie Characters". Empire. p. 30. Archived from the original on October 18, 2012. Retrieved February 5, 2012.
  21. ^Laporte, Nicole (2010). The Men Who Would Be King: An Almost Epic Tale of Moguls, Movies, and a Company Called DreamWorks. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 277. ISBN .
  22. ^Thompson, Anne (April 30, 2010). "DreamWorks Tell-All Exposes Katzenberg Shrek Bail-Out". IndieWire. Archived from the original on October 16, 2012. Retrieved February 21, 2012.
  23. ^"Shrek's house, early concept". Paul Shardlow. Sketchbook. May 27, 2010. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  24. ^"Barron Park Donkeys". RosettaStoneInc.com. Archived from the original on November 30, 2001. Retrieved December 22, 2007.
  25. ^Tracy, Joe (2001). "dFX Interview: Raman Hui". digitalmediafx.com. Archived from the original on October 11, 2011. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  26. ^ ab"Shrek : Production Information". Culture.com. Archived from the original on April 17, 2013. Retrieved February 4, 2012.
  27. ^ abcdTracy, Joe (2001). "Animating Shrek – Behind the scenes". digitalmediafx.com. Archived from the original on March 24, 2012. Retrieved February 5, 2012.
  28. ^Wloszczyna, Susan (May 18, 2001). "Pigs, dwarfs and Pinocchio, but no Goldilocks". USA Today. Archived from the original on November 13, 2002. Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  29. ^LaPorte, Nicole (2010). The Men Who Would Be King: An Almost Epic Tale of Moguls, Movies, and a Company Called DreamWorks. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 58. ISBN .
  30. ^Dawn, Randee (March 18, 2013). "Nicolas Cage: No regrets on turning down 'Shrek'". Today. Archived from the original on August 10, 2015. Retrieved August 10, 2015.
  31. ^ abcdefHill, Jim (May 16, 2004). "How "Shrek" went from being a train wreck to one for the record books". JimHillMedia.com. Archived from the original on October 18, 2012. Retrieved August 3, 2011.
  32. ^Griggs, Brandon. "Hear Chris Farley's Shrek in newly unearthed clip". CNN. Archived from the original on August 9, 2015. Retrieved August 10, 2015.
  33. ^"Mike Myers forces £4m rejig of Shrek". The Guardian. London. May 2, 2001. Archived from the original on December 24, 2013. Retrieved January 28, 2012.
  34. ^"The Best Revelations from Mike Myers' WTF Podcast: 'Wayne's World,' 'Shrek,' and More". Yahoo!. July 29, 2014. Archived from the original on October 4, 2015. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  35. ^"Shrek's appeal; WHY MYERS' OGRE JUST HAD TO HAVE SCOTS ACCENT". thefreelibrary.com. Archived from the original on August 10, 2014. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  36. ^Villalobos, Brian (June 29, 2007). "Janeane Garofalo Talks Ratatouille". Film.com. Archived from the original on August 29, 2012. Retrieved January 28, 2012.
  37. ^"DreamWorks SKG chooses MotionAnalysis Corp. ExpertVision HiRES motion capture system for "Shrek"". thefreelibrary.com. Archived from the original on November 2, 2014. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  38. ^Raman Hui (2007). The Tech of Shrek The Third. Event occurs at 0:41. Archived from the original on November 16, 2015. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
  39. ^"Shrek FAQ". Digital Media FX. 2001. Archived from the original on January 6, 2012. Retrieved May 22, 2012.
  40. ^Burlingame, Jon (April 22, 2009). "Gregson-Williams scores many toons". Variety. Archived from the original on March 8, 2015. Retrieved March 8, 2015.
  41. ^Alex Ben Block, Lucy Autrey Wilson (2010). George Lucas's Blockbusting: A Decade-by-Decade Survey of Timeless Movies Including Untold Secrets of Their Financial and Cultural Success. HarperCollins. p. 885. ISBN .
  42. ^Shrek (Original Motion Picture Score). 2001. 302 066 308 2.
  43. ^"The Never-ending Life of Smash Mouth's "All Star"". 2019. Archived from the original on September 14, 2019. Retrieved July 13, 2019.
  44. ^Lake, Kirk (2010). There Will Be Rainbows: A Biography of Rufus Wainwright. Skyhorse Publishing Inc. pp. 141–142. ISBN . Archived from the original on March 30, 2019. Retrieved May 14, 2012.
  45. ^ abcdef"A List of Spoofs and References in PDI/DreamWorks Animated Shrek". digitalmediafx.com. 2001. Archived from the original on December 29, 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  46. ^ abZipes, Jack (2011). The Enchanted Screen Unknown History of Fairy-Tale Films. UK: Routledge. ISBN .
  47. ^"KATZENBERG'S REVENGE? - Chicago Tribune". Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
  48. ^"As Expected, Imax Reports A Loss". Studio Briefing. Culture.com. November 9, 2000. Archived from the original on October 24, 2012. Retrieved January 28, 2012.
  49. ^Carter, Meg (October 13, 2000). "Imax cinemas". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  50. ^Linder, Brian (June 8, 2000). "Shrek Like Imax". IGN. Archived from the original on February 19, 2014. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  51. ^Tracy, Joe (May 1, 2001). "Radio Disney – "No Shrek Ads!"". digitalmediafx.com. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  52. ^Tracy, Joe (June 11, 2001). "Radio Disney Allows Shrek Soundtrack Ads". digitalmediafx.com. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  53. ^"Burger King Shrek Promotion Begins Today". digitalmediafx.com. May 7, 2001. Archived from the original on January 6, 2012. Retrieved February 8, 2012.
  54. ^Baskin-Robbins in big Shrek's promotion at thefreelibrary.comArchived December 9, 2018, at the Wayback Machine.
  55. ^ abc"Shrek Video Generates $420 Million In Green". hive4media.com. January 8, 2002. Archived from the original on January 22, 2002. Retrieved September 22, 2019.
  56. ^Mccourt, Judith (April 4, 2002). "Research:Buena Vista Snags Top Sellthrough in February". hive4media.com. Archived from the original on April 7, 2002. Retrieved September 22, 2019.
  57. ^Jacobson, Colin. "Shrek: Special Edition (2001)". DVD Movie Guide. Archived from the original on October 9, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2011.
  58. ^Lyman, Rick (November 21, 2001). "Fuzzy Creatures vs. Green Ogre; 'Monsters, Inc.' and 'Shrek' Are Likely Foes for New Oscar". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 7, 2014. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
  59. ^"Pearl Harbor cleans up on DVD". The Guardian. London. December 13, 2001. Archived from the original on November 5, 2013. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  60. ^"Samsung brings "Shrek" to 3D Blu-ray". Hollywood in Hi Def. March 26, 2010. Archived from the original on March 13, 2010. Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  61. ^Calonge, Juan (October 8, 2010). "Shrek Forever After and Collection Blu-ray in December". Blu-ray.com. Archived from the original on February 19, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  62. ^"Shrek Celebrates 20 Years With New 4K Release On May 11th". bleedingcool.com. Archived from the original on March 16, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  63. ^Pandya, Gitesh. "Weekend Box Office (May 18 – 20, 2001)". Archived from the original on February 15, 2017. Retrieved December 30, 2016.
  64. ^"Shrek Opens on 3,587 Screens!". digitalmediafx.com. May 18, 2001. Archived from the original on December 29, 2010. Retrieved February 12, 2012.
  65. ^"Taking Shrek Digital". digitalmediafx.com. May 22, 2001. Archived from the original on December 29, 2010. Retrieved February 12, 2012.
  66. ^"Shrek to Air Digitally on 11 Screens". digitalmediafx.com. May 17, 2001. Archived from the original on December 29, 2010. Retrieved February 12, 2012.
  67. ^"Weekend Box Office Results for May 18–20, 2001". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  68. ^ ab"Weekend Box Office Results for May 25–27, 2001". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  69. ^"Weekend Box Office Results for May 25–28, 2001". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  70. ^"Top 2001 Movies at the Worldwide Box Office". The Numbers. Archived from the original on August 26, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2021.
  71. ^"Shrek Sets All-Time Record in Australia". Studio Briefing. July 26, 2001.
  72. ^"Shrek Returns To Top of U.K. Box Office". Studio Briefing. July 18, 2001.
  73. ^"Shrek". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  74. ^"Shrek". Metacritic. Red Ventures. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  75. ^"CinemaScore". CinemaScore. Archived from the original on January 19, 2015. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
  76. ^Ebert, Roger (May 18, 2001). "Shrek". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on July 10, 2010. Retrieved July 10, 2010.
  77. ^Wloszczyna, Susan (May 18, 2001). "'Shrek' spins jokes from fairy tales". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved January 27, 2012.
  78. ^Schickel, Richard (May 21, 2001). "Cinema: Monstrously Good". Time. Archived from the original on September 12, 2012. Retrieved January 27, 2012.
  79. ^Rainer, Peter (May 21, 2001). "Troll on a Roll". New York. Archived from the original on June 24, 2013. Retrieved March 11, 2012.
  80. ^Peter Travers (May 18, 2001). "Shrek | Movie Reviews". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on March 1, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  81. ^"Reelviews Movie Reviews". Reelviews.net. May 18, 2001. Archived from the original on April 23, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  82. ^Kenneth Turan (June 27, 1987). "A Sophisticated ... Ogre?". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  83. ^Lisa Schwarzbaum (June 1, 2001). "Shrek Review | Movie Reviews and News". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  84. ^Jay Boyar (May 18, 2001). "Contrary Fairy Tale". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  85. ^Lawson, Terry (May 15, 2007). ""Shrek" sustains creative dynasty". The Denver Post. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  86. ^"Detroit News Movie Finder". Archived from the original on March 14, 2004. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  87. ^"'Shrek' Gets Ugly, Hilariously". Daily News. New York. May 16, 2001. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  88. ^"Movie: Shrek". July 26, 2003. Archived from the original on July 26, 2003. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  89. ^Mitchell, Elvis (May 16, 2001). "Shrek (2001)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 2, 2014. Retrieved January 27, 2012.
  90. ^Puig, Claudia (May 31, 2001). "'Shrek!' author exclaims his approval of film". USA Today
Sours: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrek

Small shrek text art

7/10

Enjoyable, but pales in comparison to the first two movies.

TheLittleSongbird12 May 2009

I enjoyed Shrek the Third, but I found a lot of it very disappointing as well. The plot is very contrived, and has been done better many times before. The script, has a number of very bright spots, but is dull in comparison to two very good predecessors. It just goes to show how sequels are nearly always inferior to the original. In fact, the only sequels that surpass their original is Toy Story 2, Home Alone 2 and Garfield 2. There is a very funny scene with Donkey and Puss in Boots having a sort of body swap, and Donkey doing that priceless innocent eye look. But that is pretty much it, though girls may delight in Fiona and all the fairytale princesses having some sort of princess reunion. The animation is mostly well done, and the voice talents are very good indeed, especially Eddie Murphy and Antonio Banderas. However, the film, which showed a lot of promise, is undermined by a contrived storyline and an uneven script. All in all, enjoyable, but it could have been much better. 6.5/10 Bethany Cox.

6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

A step backwards

SnoopyStyle15 August 2014

Prince Charming is reduced to dinner theater and he wants revenge. King Harold is ill and Shrek is the next heir to Far, Far Away. Shrek isn't that good with being a royal and doesn't want to give up his swamp. King reveals that there is another heir named Arthur (Justin Timberlake). After the death of the King, Shrek sets off to find Artie with the help of Donkey and Puss in Boots. Princess Fiona is left at home to battle Prince Charming's attempted coup with her royal girlfriends.

Starting with the king dying is a hard way to keep the tone light. Also Shrek is separated from Fiona for the bulk of the movie. Then there is the new character Artie who is the least interesting character in this world. However I still love the cast of characters in this franchise. I also love the new princesses. They are a lot of fun. This is a step back but the franchise lives on.

1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

8/10

Funny With a Great Message

claudio_carvalho21 August 2007

When Fiona's father and King of Far Far Away passes away, the clumsy Shrek becomes the immediate successor of the throne. However, Shrek decides to find the legitimate heir Artie in a distant kingdom with his friends Donkey and Puss in Boots to be able return to his beloved house in the swamp with the pregnant Fiona. Meanwhile, the envious and ambitious Prince Charming joins the villains of the fairy tales plotting a coup d'état to become the new king.

"Shrek the Third" is very funny, having a great message in the end and completely underrated in IMDb. There are many unfair reviews and I really do not understand what these users have seen to dislike in this animation. There are many new characters from the fairy tales, but all of them has space along the plot, in at least one scene, and I liked, for example, the Cyclops with his beautiful daughter or the lines of Captain Hook just to mention two of them. I saw a version dubbed in Portuguese and the dialogs are excellent. The soundtrack is a plus and I loved "Immigrant Song" and "Baraccuda" in the attack of the heroines. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Shrek Terceiro" ("Shrek The Third")

11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Enjoyable even if it is rather overblown and lacks a real core of wit and story

bob the moo16 March 2008

Shrek and Fiona are finding it hard going standing in for the King and Queen of Far Far Away Land but at least the end is in sight. However when King Harry dies and leaves the throne to Shrek (the only other heir is a high-school student), the problem of public appearances and endless ceremony appears not to be going away. So, despite the worrying news of Fiona's pregnancy, Shrek sets sail with his friends to bring Arthur, the only other heir, back to claim his throne (rightful or not) so Shrek can get back to his swamp. However, while he is away, Prince Charming lead a cast of villains on a coup d'etat on the leaderless land.

The third Shrek film was rather beaten by critics when it was released, to the point that I decided not to bother with it in the cinemas (although the impact of a kiddie audience also helped put me off). This evening I decided to watch the films that LoveFilm had sent me and, as if to show that I do tend to watch a diverse mix of things I found that my viewing for tonight was the brutal Irréversible followed by this film (well, after a short recovery break). The contrast is different I'm sure you'll agree but I was looking forward to Shrek after that experience. So perhaps I forgave it some things that I wouldn't have otherwise as a form of release from the bleakness. In this way I found some of the film to be quite fun but even in this state I still have to say that the film is weaker than the second, which was in turn weaker than the first.

The problem is again with the plot. In the first film the story was the core of everything and all the references and jokes branched off this. Here the opposite is true as the story seems to happy with lots of material put around it. The difference can be best seen in the fact that the plot mostly provides a frame for the film but the laughs and fun generally come in the asides and the support characters rather than the main flow or the main characters. This is not a massive failure, because the laughs are there, but it is at very least a weakness and after a while it became noticeable that I was not really that interested in Shrek or Arthur but just looking forward to the next scene with the Gingerbread Man. Ironically the plot is rather complex and will probably be over the head of the child viewers and it did make me long for a simpler but stronger story.

The cast continue to do pretty well regardless. Myers and Diaz are both OK mainly because the film doesn't hand them great material to work with. Murphy and Banderas are both fun for the opposite reason while the supporting cast of Big Bad Wolf, Gingerbread, pigs etc all continue to be fun. Timberlake, Andrews, Everett, McShane and so on are OK but not great with only Python's Idle and Cleese standing out among the star names.

Overall then an enjoyable film with just about enough laughs to carry it but still the weakest in the Shrek series. The plot is overly complex and the majority of fun belongs to the minor characters while the title roles are too tied up in the busy narrative to have time to consistently deliver the laughs. Shrek Goes Forth (or something like that) seems inevitable so hopefully the makers can take what continues to work from here and put right what has been falling down in the last two films.

1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

4/10

A few good moments, but ...

kosmasp28 June 2007

... doesn't make a good movie! I think my nephew, my niece and her friend enjoyed the movie more, especially because of the fact that Justin T. played in this one too. Although they tried to come up with good new ideas, many just didn't work out (for me). One thing is sure though: A "Puss-N-Boots" spin-off could be really great, especially if Donkey is in it too.

The chemistry between the two of them in this movie (and a "crazy" thing that happens to them) does elevate it. Although it seems like Antonio Banderas got the cooler lines than Donkey, it didn't bother Eddie Murphy. I personally think, as far as Shrek goes they should stop with this one ... A donkey spin-off would be great too, but no more Shrek for me please! (Edit: I take that last sentence back and hope they stop with the forth Shrek movie!)

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

5/10

Shrek the Third

jboothmillard29 November 2007

Warning: Spoilers

The first two films were packed with plenty of gags and wit for all the family, but I have to say this second sequel, you can tell they are struggling to keep it fresh, but it is still a fun film. Basically King Harold (John Cleese), now a toad, has fallen ill, and until he gets better Shrek (Mike Myers) and Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz) have to take care of all his jobs, e.g. knighting people, launching ships and dressing like royals, all going disastrously wrong. Before the King dies he mentions the only other person besides Shrek suitable to run the kingdom, Arthur (Justin Timberlake), in Worcestershire. So while Shrek, Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) set off to go and find him, a vengeful Prince Charming (Rupert Everett) and many fairytale villains are storming the kingdom to get their happily ever after that was taken from them. In the end, all the villains are defeated and Charming seems to have been killed, Artie, having doubts earlier, does decide to become king, Puss and Donkey, having their bodies swapped, go back to normal, and Shrek and Fiona return to the swamp with three ogre triplets. Also starring Julie Andrews as Queen Lillian, Eric Idle as Merlin, Cody Cameron as Pinocchio and others, Larry King as Doris (Jonathan Ross replaced him in Shrek 2), Cheri Oteri as Belle, Maya Rudolph as Rapunzel, Amy Sedaris as Cinderella and Conrad Vernon as Gingerbread Man and others. The good jokes include the King that won't die (three times), the song "Live and Let Die" for the funeral, the baby nightmare (including the puking), and a great song at the end by Murphy and Banderas, "Thank You (For Letting Me Be Myself)". It may have the good voices and the still great computer wonderful animation, but it is not as good as the previous two, but still a fun animated fantasy comedy adventure. Worth watching!

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

A somewhat weaker third instalment

Tweekums29 January 2017

Warning: Spoilers

The king is ill so Shrek and Fiona have to take over various royal duties with fairly disastrous results. Then the King dies and it looks as though Shrek is going to be the next king, something he does not want, luckily just before dying the king mentioned another heir; Arthur. Shrek, Donkey and Puss in Boots set off to find Arthur and as their boat sets sail Fiona tells Shrek that she is pregnant. While they are away bringing a reluctant Arthur back to Far, Far Away Prince Charming is rallying various fairy tale villains to help him seize the kingdom. On the way home Shrek and his fellow travellers meet the wizard Merlin who helpfully transports them back home… unfortunately swapping the bodies of Donkey and Puss! By now Charming has taken the Kingdom and Fiona and the various fairy tale 'princesses' are imprisoned… but not for long.

The first two films in the series were a lot of fun but sadly while this is still pretty decent it falls a fair way short of those two films. Trying to add elements of the Legend of King Arthur didn't work as well as they might have done as he was a fairly boring character. Other aspects of the story just don't make sense; most notably the idea that when the king dies Shrek would be the next ruler rather than Princess Fiona. There is also a lack of decent songs; apart from the rather amusing use of the theme from 'Live and Let Die' during the King's funeral none were memorable. There are some good points of course; having Donkey and Puss swap bodies was rather amusing, the king's extended death scene was hilarious (loved the fly) and it is great the see that the damsels were far from in distress as they broke out of the dungeon. Overall a decent enough film but a bit disappointing as a 'Shrek' film.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

4/10

NOT a happy ending for the franchise.

BA_Harrison14 January 2008

Shrek and Shrek 2 are classics of CGI movie-making, brimming with charm, great jokes and visual excellence; Shrek The Third, on the other hand, is as stagnant as the swamp that the titular ogre calls home, reeking of lazy writing and stinking up the place with stale jokes.

When the king of Far, Far, Away finally croaks (he's a frog.... geddit?), Princess Fiona and Shrek are expected to take his place on the throne. But Shrek, being the miserable git that he is, doesn't want the responsibility, and so he sets sail (along with Donkey and Puss-in-Boots) in search of the only other heir—a young student named Arthur Pendragon.

Meanwhile, a miffed Prince Charming, who feels that he should rightfully be king, plots to take the title by force.

I had been warned that the third instalment in the Shrek series wasn't on a par with its predecessors, but decided to watch it anyway, reasoning that even a bad Shrek movie would be better than most contemporary kids movies. Unfortunately, it seems that I was fooling myself.

With a mediocre plot overloaded with poorly developed characters, and a practically laugh-free script, Shrek The Third is a pitiful effort that should never have been made. When a film's funniest moment—the repeated last gasps of the frog king—is not only very predictable, but also extremely familiar (I just can't put my finger on where I've seen this before—it'll come to me... eventually), then it's time to give up. The fairytale is well and truly over.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

A Shrek take, on the King Arthur story.

TxMike7 January 2008

Warning: Spoilers

At least the three Shrek stories are each unique, and only build on characters developed in the earlier ones. I will still think, as I suppose most will, that the first one was the best.

Here Shrek and Fiona visit her parents in Far, Far Away land, but dad, the King (as a frog) is ill and dying. Shrek and Fiona are made temporary King and Queen, but they just aren't cut out for the job, especially Shrek, as almost everything he gets involved in goes wrong.

So most of the story is the search for the person who will become King. Prince Charming desperately wants to become King Charming, but the dying king had Arthur, or Artie, in mind. Analogous to the traditional King Arthur story, this Artie is young and small, and often picked on by others.

This movie is a bit darker than the first two, in that both Fiona and Shrek become imprisoned separately, and there is talk of killing Shrek, and also of killing Artie. But Artie gives a speech to the bad guys about "haven't you ever wanted to get out of your own way and become the person you really wanted to?"

The animation is superb, and the characters that are supposed to be people, like Artie, look very life-like. As in traditional film making, where camera movement is used to add interest to a scene, the animation simulates all the various camera movements we have become used to.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

Shrek the Third is pretty entertaining for another sequel

tavm19 May 2007

Warning: Spoilers

When I saw the previews for Shrek the Third, part of me felt a little of the "been there, done that" emotion simply because, having enjoyed the first two Shrek films with the constant pop-culture references and turning clichés upside down, I felt the plot of this one give the vibe of predictability. The movie, however, made the most of advancing the characters to some kind of maturity that seemed, for the most part, natural. Like the title character's impending fatherhood and his nightmare version of it that parodies Rosemary's Baby. Or Shrek's wisecracks and wisdom that surfaces during the spoofs of overblown Broadway musicals. I loved Eric Idle as an aged Merlin and Shrek's heart-to-heart with Arthur that had the beginning of "That's What Friends Are For" playing. Also loved the body switches of Donkey and Puss-in-Boots and seeing the other fairy-tale princess in kick butt mode. So while not as hilarious as the first two Shrek films, this third one is still entertaining enough for me to recommend to the whole family. And stay for the "Thank For Letten Me Be Mice Elf Agin" sequence during the credits. Thanks, Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, Antonio Banderas, John Cleese, Julie Andrews, Rupert Everett, Larry King, Regis Philbin, Amy Poehler, Amy Sedaris, Cheri Oteri, Maya Rudolph, Eric Idle, Justin Timberlake and all the other voices for making Shrek the Third as entertaining as possible!

0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The best of the 3 Shreks

Gordon-1110 September 2007

For some reason, the previous two Shreks did not appeal to me. However, I find this one a lot better than the previous two, and I actually secretly chide myself for liking Shrek 3.

The animation of the film is as good as usual. The various characters are given similar story time, and the cat is featured quite prominently, which I suspect is to prepare for a spin off. The fact that the donkey gets a lot less lines in this film is a bonus, because I have always found him very annoying. The story is simple in the film, but it brings out a lot of positive messages such as friendship, mutual support, and that anyone can achieve if they try. My conclusion is that it is a watchable film!

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

5/10

The King croaks...and Shrek revolts.

michaelRokeefe19 May 2007

Warning: Spoilers

The third in the animated comedy series. Not on par with the first two, but still very funny and a hoot to watch. Shrek(Mike Myers) comes to the realization that being king is not meant for a smelly ogre. When Princess Fiona's(Cameron Diaz)father(John Cleese), the King of Far, Far Away, croaks; Shrek is next in line to rule...the likable green Shrek sets out quickly to find the rightful heir to the throne, Artie(Justin Timberlake). Shrek is joined by Donkey(Eddie Murphy)and Puss in Boots(Antonio Banderas)in finding Artie and persuade him to accept the crown. As Shrek leaves on his journey, Fiona lets him know that he is going to be a father. Meanwhile in Far, Far Away, Prince Charming(Rupert Everett)sets things in motion to claim the royal title he thought he was cheated out of. The obligatory potty humor and lightly suggestive content scores the PG rating. Other voices featured: Eric Idle, Julie Andrews, Ian McShane and Larry King. Will Shrek and triple diaper duty continue?

4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

5/10

Three shrek's and you're out

studioAT10 June 2010

People have a lot of affection for the first and second Shrek films and this one did prove to be a bit of a let down but judged on it's own it is a fair sequel that does have a lot of heart and charm.

The plot as many have said is very ordinary and feels like one of those straight to DVD sequels that Disney made throughout the late nineties. It tries to pack in all the characters we've grown to love in these films but fails to do them all justice.

It has it's moments but just cannot match the earlier films in the series. I believe the decision to wrap the franchise up after the fourth instalment may have been a wise move by Dreamworks.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

Nice

bevo-1367814 March 2021

I can't believe how many famous actors are in this one

1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

4/10

More clever than funny, this movie is almost devoid of laughs despite some game tries by the cast

dbborroughs27 May 2007

Warning: Spoilers

Shrek's father in-law dies and Shrek and Fiona are next in line.. Shrek, having been standing in for the king knows this is not the life for him so he goes off to find Artie, a kid also in line for the throne.

If you've seen anything on this you've probably seen most of what passes for the jokes. This is not a funny movie, It is well plotted, but seemingly devoid of any laugh out loud humor. I sat there for the entire running time straight faced. I can admire the animation, I can admire the cleverness of "the jokes" and I can admire the too many "in" references, but I can't find it funny. (well thats not true, the Shrek baby stuff at the end is funny) If you want what I think is the perfect example of whats wrong with the film take the funeral for the king. The king has died and we hear Paul McCartney's live and Let Die (you know the James Bond theme song). Why? I have no clue...actually after what seems like an eternity fumbling around for a punch line we see a choir of frogs singing the song, Two minutes of screen time for a throw away joke about a short film that Paul McCartney produced that almost no one has seen in the US-Rupert and the Frog Song.The film is full of set ups to jokes that are so obscure that not even Jude would get them.(see what I'm getting at Thomas?) The humor is either obvious slapstick or these obscure duds. Clearly this what happens when you get too many animators and lock them in a room with a predetermined release date.

Whats worse this seems like a (better) version of the dreadful Happily N'ever After so that those of us who suffered through that piece of horse hockey, get to watch a chunk of the plot reused (to better effect) here. Shrek three can't win for losing.

Wait for Cable

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

6/10

SHREK THE THIRD (Chris Miller and Raman Hui, 2007) **1/2

Bunuel197615 July 2007

I had enjoyed the first Shrek film due to its novelty but was somewhat lukewarm towards the second; I'm even more so, then, with respect to this new entry. It's still eminently watchable for the gags, the in-jokes and the apparently unlimited possibilities of the CGI technique. The best new character is surely Eric Idle's accident-prone Merlin, while the most amusing sequences are those involving the Frog King's death and Shrek's nightmare about his upcoming parenthood. However, its gang of gung-ho fairy-tale heroines and the generally modern attitudes on display – to say nothing of the typically refurbished pop/rock songs on the soundtrack (including, of all things, Led Zeppelin's "Immigrant Song"!) – seem less intent on fulfilling the necessities of the plot than catering to potential box-office receipts!

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

8/10

I liked it surprising more than the second one.

Boba_Fett11384 June 2008

Even though I can enjoy the Shrek movies, I just never have a too big fan of it. The first movie was good but also sort of overrated and the second part had too many misses in it. I therefor also expected to not enjoy this third part of the Shrek series and my expectations for it weren't high. Nevertheless I really enjoyed this movie and it was a positive thing that the film-makers this time actually tried out some new things, rather than making this movie a rehearsal of the first 2 Shrek movies.

Seems like they stopped with the spoofing this time and went for some originality and creativity of its own. It doesn't make "Shrek the Third" the Shrek movie with the most laughs in it but it also makes it the less forced of the Shrek movies. The previous Shrek basically tried to be constantly funny and often went over-the-top with this. This movie rarely goes over-the-top, perhaps only toward its ending and then mostly with its action.

Because the story is more original of its own the movie as a whole also feels fresher and therefor it becomes a pleasant movie to watch, even if it doesn't have the most laughs in it. It must also have got to do with the fact that this movie is directed by different people than those who directed the first two Shrek movies. A good choice to go with different directors, even though its also true that it must have something to do that director of the first two Shrek movies Andrew Adamson is now days a successful live-action film-maker and he is the director of the first two Chronicles of Narnia movies.

Technology hasn't stand still since the last Shrek movie, for this Shrek movie is better looking then ever before. The animations are simply flawless and it most be lovely to work with technology like this. The opportunities are basically endless and there are no boundaries.

Good thing is that they also didn't introduced too many new characters this time. Basically most characters who also appeared in the first two Shrek movies re-appear in this movie again but in a more restrained way, which assures that this Shrek movie is really about Shrek.

Thing I don't like about the Shrek movies is its moralistic undertone and themes. There's always a message in these movies and I feel the movies would be a lot more entertaining if they completely drop this and go for simple pure entertainment instead. All of the Shrek movies have a certain amount of drama in it. I'm just not waiting for this amount of drama whenever I'm watching an animated movie.

If they continue making on Shrek movies in the same trend as this movie than "Shrek Goes Fourth" might not turn out to be such a bad movie after all.

8/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

Underwelming addition to the promising animated franchise

george.schmidt21 May 2007

Warning: Spoilers

SHREK THE THIRD (2007) **1/2 (VOICES OF : Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, Antonio Banderas, Justin Timberlake, Julie Andrews, John Cleese, Rupert Everett, Eric Idle, Larry King, John Krasinki, Ian McShane, Cheri Oteri, Regis Philbin, Amy Poehler, Maya Rudolph, Amy Sedaris, Seth Rogen.) Underwhelming addition to the animated franchise this time with the ogre Shrek facing impending parenthood with his beloved Princess Fiona and attempting to persuade cousin Artie to take the rightful place on the throne in spite of Prince Charming's nefarious plans to rule Far, Far Away. While the animation is splendidly gorgeous as usual there are too many characters given little to do and the main characters seeming to just be going through the motions. Overall not terrible but the weakest entry to date for the promising trilogy. (Dirs: Chris Miller and Raman Hui)

0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

Diminishing returns

neil-47630 December 2013

Warning: Spoilers

Following the death of Fiona's father, and his installation as acting King (which he finds objectionable), Shrek heads off in search of a member of the bloodline to be installed as King.

With this third instalment, the law of diminishing returns sets in. Yes, it is funny, and eye catching, and the voice talent does well (joined this time by Justin Timberlake as young Artie), but there is a feeling of having seen it all before. Some of the gags are clever (using Live And Let Die at the King's funeral as an oblique reference to Paul McCartney having done the Frog Song, for instance), but things are starting to feel a little stale.

I would still say that it is worth seeing rather than not seeing, though.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

4/10

Three Too Many.

anaconda-406589 June 2015

Warning: Spoilers

Shrek the Third (2007): Dir: Chris Miller, Raman Hui / Voices: Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy, Antonio Banderas, Justin Timberlake: Disappointing third film in the Shrek franchise. The theme is empowerment as ogre Shrek learns that he is next in line as King. When he learns of Fiona's cousin Arthur he sets out to bring him back in hopes that he will take responsibility as King and leave him to his comfortable ogre lifestyle. Structure is routine and similar to the first film. Mike Myers voices Shrek who learns of Fiona's pregnancy and stressed with the thought of fatherhood. He is the only character with any broad development as he attempts to ditch his responsibility yet accept another. Eddie Murphy voices Donkey and Antonio Banderas voices Puss N' Boots but both are more or less along for the ride as mere road movie props. Even Princess Fiona, voiced by Cameron Diaz seems to merely exist after informing Shrek of his future role as father. This is all done in glorious computer animation that is colourful and bright but without a decent screenplay it comes off as a great painting. Justin Timberlake voices Arthur, Fiona's cousin and second heir to the throne, and the role is a steal. Directed by Chris Miller and Raman Hui whose combined talent cannot bring life into this third and forgettable entry in a franchise that has just hit its last chapters. Score: 4 ½ / 10

1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

6/10

Who doesn't want to be king?

HotToastyRag29 September 2021

No matter how well you try to raise your kids, they end up disappointing you at every turn, don't they? Take King John Cleese and Queen Julie Andrews in the Shrek movies: Their beautiful daughter, an only child, was raised as a princess. How does she repay them? Instead of marrying Prince Charming, she marries an ogre. She takes the form of an ogre herself, even when given a second chance to reverse the curse. And when it's time for her and her husband to inherit the throne, they don't want it! All those poor parents did was lock her in a tower when she was younger - was that so bad?

All kidding aside, even though the Shrek movies have a fairy tale setting, they are pretty realistic. When someone's a thorn in your side, they continue to be as the years go by. Shrek was argumentative, coarse, and disrespectful when he first met his in-laws in Shrek 2, and in the next movie he doesn't learn his lesson. Rather than immediately stepping up to the plate and learning as much as he can about ruling a kingdom, he wallows in his bad mood and tries to weasel out of his inheritance. Who's the scapegoat? Fiona's teenaged cousin, voiced by Justin Timberlake. While Shrek tries to find the kid and convince him to take over, Prince Charming (hooray, he's not out of the picture!) tries his own takeover.

Of the four, this one probably has the most drama in it, so if you're expecting to laugh as much as you've been doing during the first two movies, you might be disappointed. But if you're expecting a lot of whining, some sad events, and quite a bit of battle scenes, you're in a good position to enjoy it.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

A Nutshell Review: Shrek the Third

DICK STEEL29 May 2007

It has just been the start of the summer season, and the sequels are raking in the millions, despite lacklustre reviews no doubt stemming from familiarity and expectations built from successes of the predecessor films. Still, they are raking in the millions, and possibly the largest franchises in recent years converge onto 2007 as they feature their third movies, and leaving the door open for possibly more to come. Spidey 3 had too many characters, as did Pirates 3, as they both seek to expand the fantasy world they belong to, which to some worked against their favour as it meant less screen time for some beloved characters.

And we welcome back our favourite giant green ogre Shrek, who in its third installment, expands its mythology as well with the introduction of various characters from the Camelot tale, most notably those of Lancelot, Genevieve, Merlin and of course, Arthur himself. As we last left out heroes, Shrek (Mike Myers) and Fiona (Cameron Diaz) are back to living with royalty in the kingdom of Far Far Away, now with pals Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) and Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and family.

Now if that's a handful, wait till the story moves forward with Shrek and the faithful buddies going on a mission to seek out an heir to the throne, Artie/Arthur (Justin Timberlake), who certainly doesn't bring the sexy back to the crown, and you must watch this as once again the filmmakers turn on their creativity and cunningness to develop a character (and other characters) in ways you'd never expect them to behave. Which is what most audiences would have enjoyed with the previous films, though this time round, there seemed to be a line drawn on the ground not to overdo the references to pop culture, sight gags and rounds of puns.

And the villainous Prince Charming is back, with ambitions to be King Charming, and here's where the story fell a bit short, as it adapted from the other animated movie Happily N'ever After, where the bad guys who always seem to have their luck run out, group together and forcefully take over the kingdom. It's a pity the majority aren't memorable, given that we're already so familiar with the good guys, and they just fail to add more colour, instead it became repetitive with Charming's narcissistic behaviour. Boring.

But there are good moments in the movie though, and I can't get enough of those princess types in Snow White, Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella. Despite its expanded cast, the story still managed to put focus on our main trio of Shrek, Donkey and Puss in Boots, at the expense of Fiona who becomes more of a side with her anxious maternal instincts kicking in. The story did feel at times to drag along, especially with Shrek playing surrogate father of sorts, and its trying real hard in attempts to weave in some feel good, moral messages, slowing down the pace, and at one point, tried to go back to its zany ways with some inane happenings, as if a sudden jolt of a reminder not to bore with preachy stuff.

Perhaps Shrek 3 might have lost some of its charm, but it definitely is miles ahead of the poorly animated Legend of the Sea. It's a no brainer which animated movie to watch this school holidays.

3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

6/10

Spaceballs 2- . . . I mean, Shrek 3: The Search for More Money

Mr-Fusion14 August 2017

Easily the weakest of the three movies, plotwise (I know there are four, but this is enough), leaving most of its charms to the ever-increasing background characters. Almost like clockwork, whenever I'd start to drift, Gingerbread Man would show up and steal the scene; or Merlin (Eric Idle); or Arthur (Justin Timberlake).

It's clear that the machine is running on fumes at this point, but it's not really a dud; there are a few bits of hilarity. You just have to wait around for them.

6/10

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The best possible animation production

jdesando16 May 2007

A neutered donkey is just a braying ass as far as I'm concerned, and in Shrek the Third Eddie Murphy's once fast talking, acidic, contrary sidekick Donkey becomes just another concerned friend of Shrek. Therein lies my primary criticism of an otherwise crowd-pleasing tale of the Ogre (Mike Myers) and his wife, Fiona (Cameron Diaz), tiring of taking care of the Far, Far Away kingdom while the frog king (John Cleese), Fiona's father, is ailing. Upon his death they search for the next-in-line heir to take the burden off the Shreks ("I am an ogre. I'm not cut out for this," Shrek tells his wife).

This amusing fairy tale with major characters from great tales such as Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Rapunzel, Snow White, and Captain Hook, among others, has a smart theme about being yourself despite negative attitude from others. It is carried through most of the film, starting with people's initial revulsion at seeing Shrek and not seeing his humanity to Arthur becoming king despite the "loser' appellation given by his high school peers. The parody of a Beverly Hills high school in which girls use "like" in every sentence with high pitched, "Oh-my-God" voices is funny material. The opening vaudeville show, medieval style, is ingenious as is the raucous sequence in which the Shrek and Fiona struggle with their royal costumes. Of course, DreamWorks has incorporated the best possible animation production, right down to silky hair bouncing perfectly.

Despite the sweeter characters in Shrek the Third and the streamlined, focused plot, I miss the torrent of pop-cult references in the first and second editions. I'm still threatening to go back to savor all the references, the ones I heard and the many I missed.

But I have too many new films to see, the older ones drifting far, far away.

14 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

It was good, but it's lacking something

Smells_Like_Cheese18 May 2007

I couldn't wait to see Shrek the Third, especially since I have such a great love for the second Shrek, I'm just in love with Puss in Boots. But, the trailer looked great and the stories have worked so far, my mom and I saw the premier show today and while the movie has great laughs, there seemed to be something lacking in the Shrek world. I think the characters didn't seem to click as well as they did in the first two. Shrek the Third has the return of the whole cast, including the new heir to the thrown, Arthur.

Shrek and Fiona have a problem, Fiona's father, the frog King of Far Far Away, has passed away and now it's up to Shrek to take the crown. But Shrek is too scared to step up and looks to the next man in line, well, actually a teenage, Arthur. Shrek, Puss, and Donkey go to find Artie, but there is one more problem going on, Prince Charming wants his kingdom of Far Far Away back like it was promised to him and he will go through anything to get it back. Fionna and the other princesses are kidnapped while Shrek's life is in danger and they must all pull together to save him in time for Arthur to take over the kingdom.

Shrek the Third has great jokes, terrific animation, and lovable characters, especially the character, Merlin, he was just a terrific spoof. But the characters seemed to be lacking the same chemistry as they did in the first two films. I would recommend Shrek the Third, it's a good movie for the family and for a summer movie, because I do guarantee a fun time. I don't know if everyone will agree, but so far I know a few people know that there is something lacking from the world of Shrek.

7/10

147 out of 216 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

An error has occured. Please try again.

Sours: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413267/reviews
Baby Yoga Song + More Nursery Rhymes \u0026 Kids Songs - CoComelon
Artwork by William Steig. ©William Steig. All rights reserved.

Artwork by William Steig. ©William Steig. All rights reserved. From the permanent collection of Norman Rockwell Museum, gift of Jeanne Steig.

Norman Rockwell Museum Exhibition to Showcase Donated Illustration Art Collection
from “The King of Cartoons”

William Steig: Love and Laughter
on View June 12 through October 31, 2010

Press images available upon request

Stockbridge, MA, May 10, 2010- Once named the “King of Cartoons” by Newsweek magazine, William Steig (1907-2003) is renowned for his uproarious comic art, and such best-selling illustrated books as the
Caldecott-winning Sylvester and the Magic Pebble, and Shrek! (the inspiration for the blockbuster DreamWorks animated films). A new exhibition explores the breadth of this true American master’s inspired career, from his earliest New Yorker cartoons to his buoyant magazine covers and brilliantly funny reflections on love and life. Accompanying the artist’s work will be a collection of three-dimensional sculptures and assemblages created by Jeanne Steig, a gifted artist and author, and William Steig’s wife of 35 years. The installation reveals the joys of their creative co-habitation and the emergence of themes in both artists’ work which speak to their shared vision. William Steig: Love and Laughter is on view at Norman Rockwell Museum from June 12 through October 31, 2010.

Norman Rockwell Museum is also honored to announce the donation of an impressive collection of more than 800 original artworks by William Steig to the Museum’s permanent collection of illustration art. This generous gift of works spanning the artist’s seven-decade career is made possible by Jeanne Steig, who wishes to share her husband’s art though ongoing public access and preservation. “We are honored to become the custodians of this important collection of works by a true visionary in the field of illustration,” notes Museum Director and CEO Laurie Norton Moffatt. “For over seventy years, William Steig made America laugh while offering thoughtful commentary on life’s joys and challenges. Our sincere thanks to Jeanne Steig for sharing her husband’s great gift with us, which will become a cherished part of our permanent illustration collection.” “The Board of Trustees is honored that Jeanne Steig has chosen Norman Rockwell Museum as a home for an important selection of William Steig’s art,” announced Thomas L. Pulling, Chairman of the Museum’s Board of Trustees. “Steig was a master observer of daily life and human interrelations, and his art complements those same qualities in our Rockwell collections.” “William Steig made me laugh, too,” notes Jeanne Steig from her home in Boston, Massachusetts. “His drawings- which he sometimes referred to as doodles- offered an endless, tender commentary on life in the city. They will make a perfect pairing with the work of Norman Rockwell- equally tender and observant- of life in a small town. I’m
delighted to be able to combine these two wonderful bodies of work under one museum roof.”

During his lifetime, William Steig created more than 1600 hundred drawings and one hundred seventeen covers for The New Yorker, and authored and illustrated more than twenty children’s picture books, often with an existential bent. “I think I feel a little differently than other people do. For some reason I’ve never felt grown up,” observed the artist. “Steig was a keen observer of the world around him,” notes Norman Rockwell Museum Deputy Director Stephanie Haboush Plunkett, who curated the exhibition with the assistance of curators Corry Kanzenberg and Joyce K. Schiller. “He was a gifted draftsman with an exceptional ability to communicate universally understood concepts in a single image.”

William Steig: Love and Laughter shines a light on several key stages in Steig’s artistic career: from his early gag cartoons for The New Yorker; the stream-of-consciousness symbolic artworks influenced by his ongoing fascination with psychology and Pablo Picasso; to his later works as a beloved author and with llustrator of children’s books and novels. The exhibition examines recurrent themes in both artists works– from the wonders of childhood to the intricacies of friendship and romance– with inspiration drawn from mythology and classic literature. Featured works are generously donated to Norman Rockwell Museum by Jeanne Steig, and the Museum is grateful to the Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art for loaning original drawings from Shrek! and Alpha Beta Chowder, a book illustrated by William Steig, and illustrated by his wife Jeanne.

About William Steig

Born in Brooklyn on November 14, 1907, William Steig was the son of Eastern European Jewish immigrants, a family of artists who nurtured his creative gifts from an early age. As a child, he dabbled in painting and drawing, and was an avid reader of literature. After attending high school, he spent two years at City College in New York, three years at the National Academy of Design, and a mere five days at Yale School of Fine Arts. To help support his family during the Great Depression, Steig began shopping his drawings around to publishers, eventually landing a gig at The New Yorker. His Small Fry cartoon series, depicting children in extraordinary situations inspired by his own childhood growing up in the Bronx, became a regular feature in the magazine, and were subsequently published in a number of popular cartoon collections. In 1939, Steig released the first of a collection of “symbolic drawings” inspired by psychoanalysis and modern art, which pushed the boundaries of cartoon art. The illustrator continued to experiment with artistic style and subject matter, becoming a highly influential commentator on man’s everyday struggles, foibles, and matters of the heart.

In 1968, Steig was approached by fellow New Yorker artist Bob Kraus to
contribute a illustrated book to his new publishing line. The wordplay-based CDB! heralded the start of a successful career as a children’s book author and illustrator, and included such thoughtful, adventurous tales as Roland the Minstrel Pig (1968); the Caldecott Award-winning Sylvester and the Magic Pebble (1969); Dominic (1972); Abel’s Island (1976); The Amazing Bone (1976); the Newbery Award-winning Doctor De Soto (1982); and Shrek! (1990), which has been adapted into a highly successful animated movie series, and a Broadway play. Steig passed away on October 3, 2003, leaving behind his wife and fellow artist Jeanne; son Jeremy (a jazz flutist) and daughters Lucinda and Margit, from previous marriages, and stepchildren William James and Teryl Euvremer. His original artworks are featured in the permanent collections of many noted museums including Norman Rockwell Museum, Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art, Brooklyn Museum, and Chicago Art Institute, among others.


About Jeanne Steig

A native of Chicago, Jeanne Steig is the author of several books of light verse and two books of prose, including Consider the Lemming, a Parent’s Choice Remarkable Book; The Old Testament Made Easy; Alpha Beta Chowder; A Handful of Beans, a New York Times Book Review Best Illustrated Book; and A Gift from Zeus: Sixteen Favorite Myths, a Publisher’s Weekly Best Book of the Year. All were illustrated by William Steig, with the exception of Tales from Gizzard’s Grill, illustrated by Sandy Turner, and Fleas!, illustrated by Britt Spenser. Her latest book, The Lost Art of William Steig, will be published by Harry N. Abrams next year.

Jeanne Steig is also a self-taught visual artist, working almost exclusively with street finds and other discarded materials. Her vibrant dimensional artworks have been exhibited widely over the past 35 years.

Exhibition Related Programs and Events

A Member’s Exhibition Opening for William Steig: Love and Laughter will be held on Saturday, June 12, from 7 to 9:30 p.m. Artist Jeanne Steig will offer commentary about her husband’s life and career starting at 7:15 p.m., followed by a festive evening of music, dancing, and conversation; refreshments and a cash bar will be served. Free for Museum members, $25 for non-members. RSVP requested by June 7, by calling 413.298.4100, ext. 221.

American Storyteller
Uncommon Treasures: An Evening with Jeanne Steig
Thursday, July 8, 5:30 p.m.

Spend an evening with Jeanne Steig, a self-taught visual artist working almost exclusively in street finds and other discarded materials. The author of several books of light verse and prose including Alpha Beta Chowder; A Handful of Beans, a New York Times Best Illustrated Book; and A Gift from Zeus: Sixteen Favorite Myths, a Publishers Weekly Best Book of the Year and New York Times Notable Book, Ms. Steig is the widow of noted illustrator William Steig, and her art is currently on view in William Steig: Love & Laughter. Free with Museum admission.

SuperSteig Day! Festivities for Families
Saturday, July 24, 1 to 4 p.m.

Join us for an afternoon of family fun with Jeanne Steig, whose inspired creations assembled from found objects are sure to delight. Mrs. Steig, whose dimensional creations are on view, will help you turn trash into treasures during a lively art workshop for all ages. Storytelling with Ann Underland, music, interactive gallery adventures and more will celebrate William Steig: Love and Laughter and the art of the beloved illustrator. Kids free to age 18, adults free with Museum admission.

American Storyteller
Comic Genius: An Evening with Cartoonist Liza Donnelly
Thursday, August 12, 5:30 p.m.

Explore the art of The New Yorker through the eyes of its ingenious comic creators. A cartoonist for the magazine for more than 25 years, Liza Donnelley will share the best illustrated jokes, gag cartoons, and slice-of-life drawings, offering a rare first-hand glimpse of the creative process. Ms. Donnelley’s latest book, When Do They Serve the Wine, along with Funny Ladies, Sex and Sensibility, and Cartoon Marriage, will be available for signing at a reception with the artist following the program. Free with Museum admission.

American Storyteller
The Naked Cartoonist: An Evening with Robert Mankoff
Thursday, August 19, 5:30 p.m.

Join New Yorker cartoon editor Robert Mankoff for an uproarious look at
the art of humor. One of the nation’s leading comic commentators, Mr. Mankoff originated The Cartoon Bank and the Cartoon Caption Contest, and is the creator of the magazine’s best-loved comic images. A regular guest on The Daily Show, he is also the author of The Naked Cartoonist: A New Way
to Enhance Your Creativity
, The Complete Cartoons of The New Yorker, and many other cartoon collections. A book-signing and reception with the artist will follow the program. Free with Museum admission.

Laugh Out Loud! Festivities for Families
Saturday, August 14, 1 to 4 p.m.

Laugh along with your children in this Shrek-alicious family festival filled with music, storytelling, and art-making inspired by the art of William Steig. Kids free to age 18, adults free with Museum admission.

Rotten Island! A Halloween Bash
Sunday, October 31, 2 to 4 p.m.
For ages 6 and up

Celebrate the art of William Steig and a cast of extraordinary characters, from his villains on Rotten Island to well-loved friends from Shrek!, Dr. DeSoto, and Sylvester and the Magic Pebble. Mary Jo Maichack’s Halloween tales, featuring everything from Hungarian ghosts to goofy vampire jokes, will be sure to delight with just the right amount of fright. Art activities and seasonal treats will be served. $6, $5 for Museum members.

Sours: https://www.nrm.org/2010/06/william-steig-love-and-laughter-on-view-june-12-through-october-31-2010/

You will also like:

What is your name. - Sean. Uh, nice to meet you, I muttered when he finally let go of my hand.



4687 4688 4689 4690 4691